Gamble & Ghevaert

Posts Tagged ‘Gamble and Ghevaert’

Gamble and Ghevaert welcomes the completion of the UK’s new fertility laws today

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010

By Partners Natalie Gamble and Louisa Ghevaert

The last piece of the government’s flagship Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 came into force today, completing the first major overhaul of the UK’s fertility laws in twenty years.  The HFE Bill is a major piece of government legislation which has updated the UK’s 1990 laws to bring them into line with 21st century scienific and social advances.  It has introduced important changes including:

* new rights for lesbian partners to be recognised as parents after sperm donation,

* the abolition of clinics’ obligation to consider a child’s need for a father before offering fertility treatment,

* the broadening of the extended storage rules for gametes and embryos, allowing more people to store precious embryos for longer,

* new rights for donor conceived people to make contact with genetic siblings,

* a clearer legal framework for preimplantation genetic diagnosis, and

* the widening of surrogacy laws to allow same sex and unmarried couples to apply for legal parenthood.

The Act has been brought into force in stages, with the new parenthood rules on donor conception in force first for conceptions after 6 April 2009 and the bulk of the Act in force on 1 October 2009.  The final pieces of the jigsaw, which came into force today, are the changes to surrogacy law, allowing same sex and unmarried couples to apply to court to become the parents of a surrogate born child and updating the court rules and procedures.  This completes the implementation of this major piece of government legislation, rather fittingly today, the day on which it has been announced that this Parliament will be dissolved.

The partners at Gamble and Ghevaert have been proud to have played a role at the forefront of these important legal changes, championing the position of fertility patients and same sex parents.  Our contributions to the public and Parliamentary debate and to the legal changes include:

* Helping to secure the important new rights for same sex parents (work for which Natalie was nominated by gay rights organisation Stonewall as their Hero of the Year 2008, named by Diva magazine as one of the UK’s most influential gay women, and invited to 10 Downing Street to meet the Prime Minister last month);

* Winning a last minute government U-turn on embryo storage which allowed surrogacy patients to save embryos from destruction and store them for an extended period (for which Louisa was named as Times Lawyer of the Week in October 2009);

* Lobbying for changes to surrogacy law, which were debated in Parliament (but sadly not adopted) - we are continuing to campaign on this;

* Winning improvements to nationality law for British parents of children born through surrogacy abroad following our contribution to the Department of Health’s consultation on the new parental order regulations.

Find out more about the legal changes on our website, relating to donor conception, surrogacy and fertility treatment.

Today’s Observer: New surrogacy laws ease the path to parenthood for gay men

Sunday, March 28th, 2010

By Robin McKie, science editor, The Observer, Sunday 28 March 2010

Changes to legislation will recognise growing trend for same-sex couples to become parents, say campaigners.

Gay male couples will be able to use a fast-track route to become the legal parents of surrogate children from next week. On 6 April, changes to the law will permit two men to be named as parents on a child’s birth certificate for the first time in British history.

The transition will take effect following the implementation of the final piece of the 2008 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act. This last section is aimed at helping same-sex and unmarried couples who seek to have surrogate children and will allow them to secure legal parenthood in a new, simplified manner. At present, only married, heterosexual couples can use this route.

“These changes bring the law up to date with the realities of modern 21st-century life and recognise that increasing numbers of same-sex and unmarried couples are having children together,” said Natalie Gamble, of the fertility law firm Gamble and Ghevaert.

Surrogacy has become increasingly common and offers couples an alternative route to parenthood if all other methods, including IVF treatments, fail. Current legislation allows heterosexual, married couples to get a parental order to give them a birth certificate for a child born to a mother with whom they have entered into a surrogacy agreement. But gay, lesbian and unmarried couples cannot do this. The surrogate mother has to be named on the birth certificate. If she is married, her husband is legally considered to be the father.

An example is provided by the story of Steven Ponder and his partner, Ivan Sigston. Both are police officers. Last year, they became one of the first gay couples to father a baby in Britain when Ponder’s married sister, Lorna Bradley, gave birth to a boy, William.

Crucially, however, Lorna Bradley’s name appeared on the birth certificate, which made her a legal guardian of the child. Ponder and Sigston could have applied to adopt the baby. If successful, they would have been given an adoption certificate to replace his original birth certificate. But adoption is complex and involves the intervention of social workers and other professional groups.

The new system is far more streamlined. Provided that a court is satisfied that two men are in a stable relationship; that no fees, other than expenses, are paid to the surrogate mother; and that it is in the child’s best interest, then it will award a parental order for a birth certificate to be drawn up with both men named as parents, and therefore legal guardians. “Lesbian couples and unmarried couples usually have other routes available to them if they want to have children, but surrogacy is particularly important to gay men, so they will get most out of this change in legislation,” said Gamble.In effect, the law has now opened the doors in order to make it easy for a gay man and his partner to have children.

This point was backed by Ben Summerskill, chief executive of Stonewall, the gay rights campaign group: “We are delighted that the reality of people’s family lives is being recognised at last, that both lesbian and gay couples no longer have to go through the unpleasantness of an adoption procedure.”

Gamble warned, however, that while the new legislation would make it easier for gay couples to have children, the rules governing surrogacy in the UK remained badly out of date.

“There are particular pitfalls for single parents and those going abroad. In the latter case, a couple returning to England with a surrogate child find that the law does not recognise their right to parenthood. It can cause immense distress. There are a lot of aspects of surrogacy that now need to be addressed urgently.”

 

More information about surrogacy law, international surrogacy law, and how the law is changing for same sex and unmarried couples from Gamble and Ghevaert LLP.

Fertility law, assisted reproduction and the importance of specialist legal advice

Friday, February 19th, 2010

By Louisa Ghevaert, partner at Gamble and Ghevaert LLP

If you are thinking about or undergoing fertility treatment or assisted reproduction you will no doubt spend time and energy thinking about a range of factors including success rates, clinics, cost, treatment options, egg and sperm donation, timescales and process.  However, will you stop and think about the importance of specialist fertility law advice?  You wouldn’t buy a house, get divorced or make a Will without first obtaining legal advice.  So why take any unnecessary risks when you are building your much wanted family?

Fertility treatment and assisted reproduction is often time consuming, stressful, expensive and emotionally draining.  Why potentially make matters worse by failing to get to grips with the legal issues? Fertility law often overrides biology and this can create the wrong legal outcome for the unwitting, particularly as many people have complicated personal lives and family arrangements.

If you need third party assistance to conceive are you confident that the law will recognise you as a legal parent?  Are you sure you can be named as parent on your child’s birth certificate?  Will you be able to exercise parental responsibility and for example consent to medical treatment and vaccinations for your baby? Are you sure about the legal status your partner, spouse, surrogate or donor will have for your child?

If you adopt a laissez-faire approach or lull yourself into a false sense of security that the legal side of things will be alright you could be doing yourself and your family a huge disservice.  Once you have conceived it’s often too late to avoid some of the legal pitfalls and you may then need complicated legal solutions further down the line.

If you take early specialist fertility law advice before you conceive and you tackle the legal issues as they apply to your particular circumstances you may save yourself a lot of heartache.  A well drafted donor agreement if you’re involving a known donor or a clear understanding of surrogacy law if you plan to conceive through surrogacy or a specialist Will could save you time, money and worry.

Don’t leave the legal side of things to chance.  Fertility law isn’t always well designed for modern twenty first century living.  Invest in specialist fertility law advice at the start and take control of your family’s future.

For more information about family building see our family building service.

Prime Minister responds to Gamble and Ghevaert clients’ embryo appeal

Tuesday, January 5th, 2010

Back in October, Gamble and Ghevaert clients Melanie and Robert Gladwin succeeded in winning a last minute change to the law on embryo storage, allowing them (and other prospective parents like them) to keep their precious frozen embryos.  Their campaign included a petition presented at 10 Downing Street, and the Prime Minister’s office has now formally responded, explaining the action taken to change the law and saying that “the Government recognised that [the law] could prevent these couples from having a much-wanted genetically related child“.  You can read the response on the official site of the Prime Minister’s office.

For more information on the Gladwin’s story and campaign, read our blog entry ‘Government bows to pressure on embryo storage rules’.

There is also more information on embryo storage law and how it works available on our website.

 

http://www.number10.gov.uk/Page21835

Stonewall publishes guide to the new laws on gay parenting

Thursday, December 10th, 2009

Gamble and Ghevaert LLP has worked with leading gay rights organisation Stonewall to produce a guide to the new laws on gay and lesbian parenting, called Parenthood for Same Sex Couples.  Funded by the Big Lottery Fund, the guide aims to provide clear information to service providers about the law on same sex conception and parenting, including donor insemination (and the new legal rights for lesbian couples to be named on birth certificates), co-parenting arrangements, and UK and international surrogacy for gay men.  The guide will be distributed to key service providers nationally (including law centres) and is available on the Stonewall website.

We are delighted to have helped with this project, as we think it is vitally important for there to be good and widespread understanding of the UK’s new fertility laws which rightly recognise gay and lesbian couples as parents of children they conceive together. 

Read ‘Parenthood for Same Sex Couples’.

More information on gay surrogacy law from the Gamble and Ghevaert website.

More information on donor insemination and co-parenting law from the Gamble and Ghevaert website.

More information about our public service work and fertility law services to charities.

Natalie Gamble and Louisa Ghevaert published in leading journal International Family Law

Friday, December 4th, 2009

Natalie Gamble and Louisa Ghevaert have been published in the November edition of leading international law journal, International Family Law.  The substantial article (entitled ‘The chosen middle ground: England, surrogacy law and the international arena’) discusses the problems of international surrogacy law from the UK perspective.  It takes stock of the history of surrogacy law in the UK, explaining how the law has evolved over the past 25 years through the Warnock Report, the 1985 Surrogacy Arrangements Act, the 1990 legislation, the Brazier Report and the most recent changes in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008, and examines where surrogacy law in the UK now stands. 

Without harmonisation of international surrogacy laws, and in an increasingly globalised world in which prospective parents are increasingly crossing borders for fertility treatment, UK fertility law simply has not kept pace.  The article examines the legal problems which arise for foreign couples coming to the UK for surrogacy, and the difficulties for British couples conceiving through surrogacy abroad (looking in particular at the importance of the Re X and Y case which involved a British-Ukrainian surrogacy arrangement and which Natalie and Louisa dealt with in the High Court a year ago).  The article considers the way forward, arguing that international surrogacy law desperately needs to be reviewed.

If you would like to read the article in full, please contact us for a copy.

More information about international surrogacy law from the Gamble and Ghevaert website.

Evening Standard highlights the lack of maternity leave for mothers in surrogacy situations

Friday, October 30th, 2009

The London Evening Standard has covered the lack of rights to maternity leave for mothers who have a child through surrogacy, and Natalie Gamble is quoted extensively (read the Evening Standard article ‘Women who use surrogates in fight to claim maternity leave’).  This is just one of the problems with surrogacy law which we are seeking to bring to the government’s attention as part of the Department of Health’s current consultation on changes to surrogacy law.  See our Why Surrogacy Law Needs Reviewing page for more information.

Gamble and Ghevaert celebrates the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 coming into force

Thursday, October 1st, 2009

Today marks an important step in English fertility law, with the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 - the first major review of UK fertility law for 19 years - coming into force.  The Gamble and Ghevaert website has been fully updated to take account of all the changes which apply from today, so you can read more about what the changes mean for fertility patients, including:

Embryo and gamete storage - the rules will from today be fairer and more straightforward.  Everyone will qualify for ten years’ storage, and patients who are ‘prematurely infertile’ will be able to extend this period, with no exclusion of surrogacy patients and those storing gametes or embryos as donor recipients.  More from the Gamble and Ghevaert website on embryo storage law.

An end to discrimination for lesbian and single women - fertility clinics will no longer have to consider a prospective child’s ‘need for a father’ (they will now have to consider the child’s need for ’supportive parenting’), making it clear that access to treatment should be available equally to different family structures.  More from the Gamble and Ghevaert website on fertility law and access to treatment.

Donor information rights - Donor conceived people will have new rights to contact genetic half siblings and will be able to access some information about their donor at a younger age.  Donors will also have new rights to limited information.  More from the Gamble and Ghevaert website on donor conception law.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis - The law is clarified as to what kinds of preimplantation embryo testing are acceptable within the framework of the law.  More from the Gamble and Ghevaert website on embryo testing law and PGD.

Louisa Ghevaert named as Law Society lawyer of the week

Thursday, September 17th, 2009

The Law Society Gazette has today celebrated Louisa Ghevaert in its weekly ‘Lawyer in the News’ feature.  The Gazette, published each week and sent to all solicitors in the UK, has chosen Louisa as this week’s featured lawyer.  It follows our success in achieving a change to embryo storage laws allowing our clients Robert and Melanie Gladwin to continue to store their much-wanted embryos, reported in the press last week.

More information about Louisa Ghevaert from the Gamble and Ghevaert website. 

More information on embryo storage law and the Gladwin case from the Gamble and Ghevaert website and blog.

Government bows to pressure on embryo storage rules

Wednesday, September 9th, 2009

 

Gamble and Ghevaert LLP has welcomed the Department of Health’s announcement today that embryos which exceed their five year storage period before 1 October 2009 will not now have to be destroyed (article in the Times today).

 

We have been in contact with the Department of Health on this issue for some time, arguing the case for various couples who are fighting to save their embryos because they were stored too early to benefit from new rules coming into force on 1 October.  These couples include Melanie and Robert Gladwin from Gloucester, who stored embryos in anticipation of Melanie’s treatment for cancer in 2003 in order to preserve their chance of having a family, but who were told their embryos would be allowed to perish because their storage period expires before 1 October.  Robert and Melanie’s story was reported in the Daily Telegraph on 7 August and is covered again today in response to the government’s announcement.  Robert and Melanie, who have been fighting to save their embryos, have won political support for their campaign and yesterday were invited to present a petition at 10 Downing Street.  They are not the only couple to fall into this gap in the law.  Michelle Hickman has also been a vocal campaigner on this issue for several years, and there may be many other couples who are affected.

 

In response to today’s decision that such ‘out of time’ embryos can now be stored for at least ten years, Melanie Gladwin has said:  “We are ecstatic at the news from the Department of Health.  It has been a tiresome and stressful time and are extremely thankful they have been able to consider our case so promptly. We eagerly await further news that we can keep our embryos for the full period. We hope this announcement brings joy to the other couples and families affected like us.”

 

Natalie Gamble and Louisa Ghevaert, who are representing Robert and Melanie, say:  “While the announcement today gives much needed hope to men and women whose precious embryos have already reached the end of their five year storage term, we need to make sure that the proposed changes go far enough to give the time needed.  For young women who suffer infertility prematurely, these embryos in storage often represent their last chance of having a child of their own.  We will be looking very closely at the proposals to confirm that couples like Robert and Melanie will be able to extend their chance of having a much-wanted child for as long as possible, and not just for a few more years.”

 

Further note to this blog on 11 September 2009: 

 

Gamble and Ghevaert is also now delighted to report that the Department of Health has now confirmed that, after the publication of the Minister’s Order, additional special regulations will be made to ensure that ‘out of time’ embryos like Robert and Melanie’s will be able to be stored, not just for ten years, but for the full extended period normally allowed for these kinds of medical situations. 

 

More information on embryo storage law from the Gamble and Ghevaert website.